Indeed, the causative
evils may vary not only in their degree, but also in their number and
order of action in the period of its evolution.
If it were hereditary in the sense that it is transmitted by the blood
as a specific germ or virus, then the offspring of consumptives would
have an attenuated form of the disease, which, by reasoning from
analogy, ought to secure them exemption from any further danger along
that line. Such, however, is not the case. But if we say a special
fitness is inherited, then we can understand how the offspring of
consumptives are prone to develop it, since they are not only born
with hereditary qualifications, but not infrequently they are cradled
amid the very agencies which fostered the evil in their parents, if,
indeed, they were not primarily causative.
That the contribution of heredity to consumption is great is
undoubtedly the case, and, more than any other factor, it would seem
to have a directing power in the army of inducing evils. But the fact
that the greater number of the offspring of consumptives escape the
disease, even where the general family resemblance is quite
pronounced, is readily explained by the difference in personal habits,
the circumstances of different periods or the domestic regulations
instituted by medical counsel.
Pages:
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184